Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20.378
Filtrar
1.
J Comp Eff Res ; 13(5): e230085, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567965

RESUMEN

Aim: The first objective is to compare the performance of two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI), two-stage least square (2SLS) with the multivariable generalized linear model (GLM) in terms of the reducing unmeasured confounding bias. The second objective is to demonstrate the ability of 2SRI and 2SPS in alleviating unmeasured confounding when noncollapsibility exists. Materials & methods: This study comprises a simulation study and an empirical example from a real-world UK population health dataset (Clinical Practice Research Datalink). The instrumental variable (IV) used is based on physicians' prescribing preferences (defined by prescribing history). Results: The percent bias of 2SRI in terms of treatment effect estimates to be lower than GLM and 2SPS and was less than 15% in most scenarios. Further, 2SRI was found to be robust to mild noncollapsibility with the percent bias less than 50%. As the level of unmeasured confounding increased, the ability to alleviate the noncollapsibility decreased. Strong IVs tended to be more robust to noncollapsibility than weak IVs. Conclusion: 2SRI tends to be less biased than GLM and 2SPS in terms of estimating treatment effect. It can be robust to noncollapsibility in the case of the mild unmeasured confounding effect.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Sesgo , Modelos Lineales , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Reino Unido , Simulación por Computador
2.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med ; 34(1): 3, 2024 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664469

RESUMEN

Respiratory diseases, including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are common in England with the worst respiratory outcomes observed in the most deprived areas. There is limited published research to establish whether the rate of oral corticosteroid (OCS) prescribing for asthma and COPD is linked to levels of deprivation. This study carried out a multivariable regression analysis of publicly available data and found that deprivation is associated with a statistically significant increase in the proportion of patients receiving an OCS prescription for asthma or COPD at a GP practice level (p < 0.001). The model estimated that the proportion of prescriptions is 1.88% (95% CI 1.83% to 1.92%) and 2.84% (95% CI 2.70% to 2.98%) for the least deprived GP practice and the most deprived GP practice, respectively. This study lays the groundwork for future research using individual patient level data to consider the impact of variation in OCS prescribing rates.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides , Asma , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Administración Oral , Adulto , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Adolescente , Adulto Joven
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247965, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652474

RESUMEN

Importance: Numerous studies have provided evidence for the negative associations of the COVID-19 pandemic with mental health, but data on the use of psychotropic medication in children and adolescents after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic are lacking. Objective: To assess the rates and trends of psychotropic medication prescribing before and over the 2 years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in children and adolescents in France. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used nationwide interrupted time-series analysis of outpatient drug dispensing data from the IQVIA X-ponent database. All 8 839 143 psychotropic medication prescriptions dispensed to children (6 to 11 years of age) and adolescents (12 to 17 years of age) between January 2016 and May 2022 in France were retrieved and analyzed. Exposure: Onset of COVID-19 pandemic. Main outcomes and Measures: Monthly rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions per 1000 children and adolescents were analyzed using a quasi-Poisson regression before and after the pandemic onset (March 2020), and percentage changes in rates and trends were assessed. After the pandemic onset, rate ratios (RRs) were calculated between estimated and expected monthly prescription rates. Analyses were stratified by psychotropic medication class (antipsychotic, anxiolytic, hypnotic and sedative, antidepressant, and psychostimulant) and age group (children, adolescents). Results: In total, 8 839 143 psychotropic medication prescriptions were analyzed, 5 884 819 [66.6%] for adolescents and 2 954 324 [33.4%] for children. In January 2016, the estimated rate of monthly psychotropic medication prescriptions was 9.9 per 1000 children and adolescents, with the prepandemic rate increasing by 0.4% per month (95% CI, 0.3%-0.4%). In March 2020, the monthly prescription rate dropped by 11.5% (95% CI, -17.7% to -4.9%). During the 2 years following the pandemic onset, the trend changed significantly, and the prescription rate increased by 1.3% per month (95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%), reaching 16.1 per 1000 children and adolescents in May 2022. Monthly rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions exceeded the expected rates by 11% (RR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.08-1.14]). Increases in prescribing trends were observed for all psychotropic medication classes after the pandemic onset but were substantial for anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, and antidepressants. Prescription rates rose above those expected for all psychotropic medication classes except psychostimulants (RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.09-1.15] in adolescents and 1.06 [95% CI, 1.05-1.07] in children for antipsychotics; RR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.25-1.35] in adolescents and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.12] in children for anxiolytics; RR, 2.50 [95% CI, 2.23-2.77] in adolescents and 1.40 [95% CI, 1.30-1.50] in children for hypnotics and sedatives; RR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.29-1.47] in adolescents and 1.23 [95% CI, 1.20-1.25] in children for antidepressants; and RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.98] in adolescents and 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.04] in children for psychostimulants). Changes were more pronounced among adolescents than children. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that prescribing of psychotropic medications for children and adolescents in France significantly and persistently increased after the COVID-19 pandemic onset. Future research should identify underlying determinants to improve psychological trajectories in young people.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Psicotrópicos , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiología , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Francia/epidemiología , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Betacoronavirus , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología
4.
J Comp Eff Res ; 13(5): e230044, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567966

RESUMEN

Aim: This simulation study is to assess the utility of physician's prescribing preference (PPP) as an instrumental variable for moderate and smaller sample sizes. Materials & methods: We designed a simulation study to imitate a comparative effectiveness research under different sample sizes. We compare the performance of instrumental variable (IV) and non-IV approaches using two-stage least squares (2SLS) and ordinary least squares (OLS) methods, respectively. Further, we test the performance of different forms of proxies for PPP as an IV. Results: The percent bias of 2SLS is around approximately 20%, while the percent bias of OLS is close to 60%. The sample size is not associated with the level of bias for the PPP IV approach. Conclusion: Irrespective of sample size, the PPP IV approach leads to less biased estimates of treatment effectiveness than OLS adjusting for known confounding only. Particularly for smaller sample sizes, we recommend constructing PPP from long prescribing histories to improve statistical power.


Asunto(s)
Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Simulación por Computador , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa/métodos , Tamaño de la Muestra , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Sesgo
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247604, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662373

RESUMEN

Importance: Antipsychotics, such as quetiapine, are frequently prescribed to people with dementia to address behavioral symptoms but can also cause harm in this population. Objective: To determine whether warning letters to high prescribers of quetiapine can successfully reduce its use among patients with dementia and to investigate the impacts on patients' health outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of overprescribing letters that began in April 2015 and included the highest-volume primary care physician (PCP) prescribers of quetiapine in original Medicare. Outcomes of patients with dementia were analyzed in repeated 90-day cross-sections through December 2018. Analyses were conducted from September 2021 to February 2024. Interventions: PCPs were randomized to a placebo letter or 3 overprescribing warning letters stating that their prescribing of quetiapine was high and under review by Medicare. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of this analysis was patients' total quetiapine use in days per 90-day period (the original trial primary outcome was total quetiapine prescribing by study PCPs). Prespecified secondary outcomes included measures of cognitive function and behavioral symptoms from nursing home assessments, indicators of depression from screening questionnaires in assessments and diagnoses in claims, metabolic diagnoses derived from assessments and claims, indicators of use of the hospital and other health care services, and death. Outcomes were analyzed separately for patients living in nursing homes and in the community. Results: Of the 5055 study PCPs, 2528 were randomized to the placebo letter, and 2527 were randomized to the 3 warning letters. A total of 84 881 patients with dementia living in nursing homes and 261 288 community-dwelling patients with dementia were attributed to these PCPs. There were 92 874 baseline patients (mean [SD] age, 81.5 [10.5] years; 64 242 female [69.2%]). The intervention reduced quetiapine use among both nursing home patients (adjusted difference, -0.7 days; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.1 days; P = .02) and community-dwelling patients (adjusted difference, -1.5 days; 95% CI, -1.8 to -1.1 days; P < .001). There were no detected adverse effects on cognitive function (cognitive function scale adjusted difference, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.03; P = .19), behavioral symptoms (agitated or reactive behavior adjusted difference, -0.2%; 95% CI -1.2% to 0.8% percentage points; P = .72), depression, metabolic diagnoses, or more severe outcomes, including hospitalization and death. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that overprescribing warning letters to PCPs safely reduced quetiapine prescribing to their patients with dementia. This intervention and others like it may be useful for future efforts to promote guideline-concordant care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05172687.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Demencia , Prescripción Inadecuada , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Humanos , Demencia/tratamiento farmacológico , Demencia/psicología , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Medicare , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos
7.
J Headache Pain ; 25(1): 62, 2024 Apr 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654177

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the trends and prescribing patterns of antimigraine medicines in China. METHODS: The prescription data of outpatients diagnosed with migraine between 2018 and 2022 were extracted from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperative Project of China. The demographic characteristics of migraine patients, prescription trends, and corresponding expenditures on antimigraine medicines were analyzed. We also investigated prescribing patterns of combination therapy and medicine overuse. RESULTS: A total of 32,246 outpatients who were diagnosed with migraine at 103 hospitals were included in this study. There were no significant trend changes in total outpatient visits, migraine prescriptions, or corresponding expenditures during the study period. Of the patients who were prescribed therapeutic medicines, 70.23% received analgesics, and 26.41% received migraine-specific agents. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 28.03%), caffeine-containing agents (22.15%), and opioids (16.00%) were the most commonly prescribed analgesics, with corresponding cost proportions of 11.35%, 4.08%, and 19.61%, respectively. Oral triptans (26.12%) were the most commonly prescribed migraine-specific agents and accounted for 62.21% of the total therapeutic expenditures. The proportion of patients receiving analgesic prescriptions increased from 65.25% in 2018 to 75.68% in 2022, and the proportion of patients receiving concomitant triptans decreased from 29.54% in 2018 to 21.55% in 2022 (both P <  0.001). The most frequently prescribed preventive medication classes were calcium channel blockers (CCBs; 51.59%), followed by antidepressants (20.59%) and anticonvulsants (15.82%), which accounted for 21.90%, 34.18%, and 24.15%, respectively, of the total preventive expenditures. Flunarizine (51.41%) was the most commonly prescribed preventive drug. Flupentixol/melitracen (7.53%) was the most commonly prescribed antidepressant. The most commonly prescribed anticonvulsant was topiramate (9.33%), which increased from 6.26% to 12.75% (both P <  0.001). A total of 3.88% of the patients received combined therapy for acute migraine treatment, and 18.63% received combined therapy for prevention. The prescriptions for 69.21% of opioids, 38.53% of caffeine-containing agents, 26.61% of NSAIDs, 13.97% of acetaminophen, and 6.03% of triptans were considered written medicine overuse. CONCLUSIONS: Migraine treatment gradually converges toward evidence-based and guideline-recommended treatment. Attention should be given to opioid prescribing, weak evidence-based antidepressant use, and medication overuse in migraine treatment.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos , Trastornos Migrañosos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/economía , Femenino , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , China/epidemiología , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/economía , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Triptaminas/uso terapéutico , Triptaminas/economía
8.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9273, 2024 04 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653739

RESUMEN

The presence of significant, unwarranted variation in treatment suggests that clinical decision making also depends on where patients live instead of what they need and prefer. Historically, high practice variation in surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) has been documented. This study aimed to investigate current regional variation in surgical treatment for sciatica resulting from LDDD. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of all Dutch adults (>18 years) between 2016 and 2019. Demographic data from Statistics Netherlands were merged with a nationwide claims database, covering over 99% of the population. Inclusion criteria comprised LDDD diagnosis codes and relevant surgical codes. Practice variation was assessed at the level of postal code areas and hospital service areas (HSAs). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify variables associated with surgical treatment. Among the 119,148 hospital visitors with LDDD, 14,840 underwent surgical treatment. Practice variation for laminectomies and discectomies showed less than two-fold variation in both postal code and HSAs. However, instrumented fusion surgery demonstrated a five-fold variation in postal code areas and three-fold variation in HSAs. Predictors of receiving surgical treatment included opioid prescription and patient referral status. Gender differences were observed, with males more likely to undergo laminectomy or discectomy, and females more likely to receive instrumented fusion surgery. Our study revealed low variation rates for discectomies and laminectomies, while indicating a high variation rate for instrumented fusion surgery in LDDD patients. High-quality research is needed on the extent of guideline implementation and its influence on practice variation.


Asunto(s)
Discectomía , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral , Vértebras Lumbares , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Discectomía/métodos , Laminectomía/métodos , Anciano , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Ciática/cirugía , Ciática/epidemiología
9.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 13(4): 246-249, 2024 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520324

RESUMEN

Acute bacterial upper respiratory infections are common indications for antibiotics in pediatrics, and many prescriptions may be inappropriate. Novel approaches to outpatient antimicrobial stewardship interventions are needed. This quasi-experimental study of an order set and best practice advisory alert targeting cefdinir prescriptions demonstrated an 8.4% decrease in cefdinir prescribing (P ≤ .001).


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Cefdinir , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Preescolar , Adolescente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante
10.
Radiother Oncol ; 194: 110153, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38364940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard of care for medically inoperable patients with Stage I NSCLC. The adoption of SABR and its association with cancer outcomes requires characterization. AIM: We described the management of biopsy-proven Stage I NSCLC with SABR, surgery, non-SABR curative radiotherapy (RT) and observation in Ontario, Canada, between 2010 and 2019. Temporal and geographic trends in practice and survival outcomes were analyzed. METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study conducted by linking electronic radiotherapy (RT) records to a population-based cancer registry. RESULTS: A total of 12,065 patients were identified, 61.7 % underwent surgery, 17.9 % received SABR, 8.6 % received non-SABR curative RT and 11.7 % were observed. Between 2010 and 2019, the utilization of surgery decreased (63.8 % to 49.9 %, p < 0.0001), while SABR use increased (7.5 % to 24.4 %, p < 0.0001), non-SABR curative RT use increased (6.7 % to 9.6 %, p < 0.0014) and patients observed decreased (14.4 % to 12.0 %, p < 0.0001). Substantial variation in practice exists across Ontario. Two- yr CSS improved for the entire cohort (81.9 % to 85.0 %, p < 0.0001). While there was improvement in 2 yr CSS for surgical patients (92.1 %% to 95.7 %, p < 0.001), survival for patients who received SABR, Non-SABR curative RT and observation remained stable. CONCLUSION: There has been an increase in SABR utilization and a reduction in surgical utilization with a corresponding increased survival of stage I patients in Ontario between 2010 and 2019. Substantial differences in practice patterns exist across health regions, suggesting the need for strategies to improve access to SABR in many jurisdictions.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Radiocirugia/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Ontario , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Int J STD AIDS ; 35(6): 430-437, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38261725

RESUMEN

Background: HIV-ASSIST is a free, continuously updated, clinically validated online algorithm tool that synthesizes participant- and virus-specific characteristics and provides ART decision support based on the goals of maximizing viral suppression and tolerability. The aim of this study was to analyze the concordance of clinicians' ART preferences with HIV-ASSIST recommendations and the influencing factors. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records of people with HIV (PWH) followed in the Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Department of Health Sciences University Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. The concordance between prescribed ART and HIV-ASSIST recommendations was evaluated. Results: The study included 101 participants (92 male, 91.1%), median age was 35 (20-67), and 24.8% of participants were treatment-experienced. The concordance between prescribed ART and HIV-ASSIST recommendations was 90.1% (absolute concordance 60.4%). The concordance rate was 89.5% (absolute concordance rate was 64.5%) in treatment-naive participants; 92% (absolute concordance rate was 48%) in treatment-experienced participants. Factors that were associated with discordance in the multivariate analysis were co-trimoxazole prophylaxis and hyperlipidemia. Conclusion: The recommendations of the HIV-ASSIST algorithm were found to be highly concordant with the ART prescriptions of our clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Algoritmos , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Adulto Joven , Toma de Decisiones
12.
J Nephrol ; 37(2): 451-459, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking is an independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and increases morbidity and mortality in CKD patients. The primary objective of the study was to investigate the epidemiology of smoking in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis in France. A second objective was to assess the involvement of nephrologists in supporting patients for smoking cessation. METHODS: Data on the smoking history of prevalent patients on maintenance dialysis in France between 2010 and 2020 were obtained from the REIN database (Renal Epidemiology and Information Network), updated by all French nephrology and dialysis centers. As for the support to smoking discontinuation, a questionnaire on smoking cessation assistance was sent to all members of the French Society of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation (SFNDT). RESULTS: The proportion of current smokers among patients on maintenance dialysis was 10.4% in 2010, 11.2% in 2015 and 11.6% in 2020. A total of 228 nephrologists among the 790 members of the SFNDT participated in the survey (28.9%). Most respondents were women (57.3%), worked at a public hospital (61.1%), were under 40 years of age (51.3%) and had no history of smoking (60.8%). The majority reported asking patients about their smoking status and offering brief advice. Among respondents, 72.8% offered help with smoking cessation, 46.3% referred their smoking patients to a tobacco specialist, 51.8% reported prescribing drugs to quit tobacco, and 81.6% requested further training in how to support patients for smoking cessation. CONCLUSION: Smoking cessation training for nephrologists and dedicated programs for patients in nephrology units could improve our practices and decrease the high prevalence of smoking in patients with ESKD.


Asunto(s)
Consejo , Nefrólogos , Diálisis Renal , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Humanos , Francia/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Prevalencia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Anciano , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
PLoS One ; 18(9): e0291864, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37733795

RESUMEN

Probiotics have become increasingly popular among cancer patients. However, there is limited data from a real-world setting. This study aims to conduct a retrospective analysis to understand the trend of probiotic prescriptions in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. The Mann-Kendall and Cochran-Armitage trend test was applied to estimate the trend significance. Gephi software identified the combination of probiotic strains. The binary logistic regression investigated influence factors, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient calculated correlations between probiotics and antitumor drug usage. The probiotic prescription percentage increased from 3.3% in 2015 to 4.2% in 2021 (Z = 12.77, p < 0.001). Although 48.3% of probiotic prescriptions had no indication-related diagnosis, diarrhea (OR 10.91, 95% CI 10.57-11.26) and dyspepsia (3.97, 3.82-4.12) included prescriptions most likely to contain probiotics. Prescriptions from the tertiary hospital (1.43,1.36-1.50), clinics (1.30, 1.28-1.33), and senior patients (1.018 per year, 1.017-1.019) were more likely to contain probiotics. Most probiotic prescriptions (95.0%) contained one probiotic product but multiple strains (69.3%). Enterococcus faecalis (49.7%), Lactobacillus acidophilus (39.4%), and Clostridium butyricum (27.9%) were the most prescribed strains. The probiotics co-prescribed with antitumor agents increased rapidly from 6.6% to 13.8% in seven years (Z = 15.31, p < 0.001). Oral fluorouracil agents (2.35, 2.14-2.59), regorafenib (1.70,1.27-2.26), and irinotecan (1.27,1.15-1.41) had a higher probability to co-prescribed with probiotics. There was no correlation between probiotic strain selection and specific antitumor drug use. The increasing prescription of probiotics in colorectal cancer patients in China may be related to treating the gastrointestinal toxicity of anti-cancer drugs. With unapproved indications and a lack of strain selectivity, evidence-based guidelines are urgently needed to improve probiotic use in this population.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Probióticos , Humanos , Pueblo Asiatico , China/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Arch. esp. urol. (Ed. impr.) ; 76(7): 487-493, 28 sept. 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-226426

RESUMEN

Background: The aim of the present study is to evaluate and analyze the daily clinical practice for male urethral stricture disease (MUSD) among urologists. Methods: Considering the latest guidelines on urethral stricture disease, a survey was developed regarding the various treatment options and preferences in different sites of male urethral stricture disease. The survey was sent to urologists via e-mail and phone application. Results: A total of 266 urologists completed the survey and were included in the final analysis. In regard to workplace, 62 (23.3%), 58 (21.8%), 71 (26.7%), and 75 (28.2%) respondents worked in university hospitals, training and research hospitals, state hospitals, and private practice hospitals, respectively. In regard to the diagnostic method used in male urethral strictures, 88.7% of the participants would choose uroflowmetry + postvoiding residual (UF + PVR), and 64.6% would choose retrograde urethrography (RUG). Direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU) was the most frequently chosen method in penile urethral strictures (PUS), being chosen by 72.9%. Direct vision anterior internal urethrotomy was the most common method for both ≤2 cm and >2 cm strictures, 63.1%, and 30.8%, respectively. The most preferred graft for augmentation urethroplasty was buccal mucosa (75.8%). Endoscopic incision/resection (transurethral resection (TUR)) is the most frequently applied treatment method for posterior urethral/vesicourethral anastomotic strictures (86.4%). Conclusions: The present study clearly shows that most urologists still prefer DVIU and urethral dilatation to urethroplasty in MUSD, which contradicts current guidelines. Urologists should be encouraged to perform urethroplasty and/or refer patients to experienced centres for recurrent MUSD (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstrucción Ureteral/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
CMAJ Open ; 11(4): E579-E586, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37402557

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is a rising threat to human health, and, with up to 90% of antibiotics prescribed in the community, it is critical to examine Canadian antibiotic stewardship practices in outpatient settings. We carried out a large-scale analysis of appropriateness in community-based prescribing of antibiotics to adults in Alberta, reporting on 3 years of data from physicians practising in the province. METHODS: The study cohort was composed of all adult (age 18-65 yr) Alberta residents who filled at least 1 antibiotic prescription written by a community-based physician between Apr. 1, 2017, and Mar. 6, 2020. We linked diagnosis codes from the clinical modification of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9-CM), as used for billing purposes by the province's fee-for-service community physicians, to drug dispensing records, as maintained in the province's pharmaceutical dispensing database. We included physicians practising in community medicine, general practice, generalist mental health, geriatric medicine and occupational medicine. Following an approach used in previous research, we linked diagnosis codes with antibiotic drug dispensations, classified across a spectrum of appropriateness (always, sometimes never, no diagnosis code). RESULTS: We identified 3 114 400 antibiotic prescriptions dispensed to 1 351 193 adult patients by 5577 physicians. Of these prescriptions, 253 038 (8.1%) were "always appropriate," 1 168 131 (37.5%) were "potentially appropriate," 1 219 709 (39.2%) were "never appropriate," and 473 522 (15.2%) were not associated with an ICD-9-CM billing code. Among all dispensed antibiotic prescriptions, amoxicillin, azithromycin and clarithromycin were the most commonly prescribed drugs labelled "never appropriate." INTERPRETATION: We found that nearly 40% of prescriptions dispensed to 1.35 million adult patients in Alberta's community-based settings over a 35-month period were inappropriate. This finding suggests that additional policies and programs to improve stewardship among physicians prescribing antibiotics for adult outpatients in Alberta may be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Prescripción Inadecuada , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Alberta/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
BMC Pulm Med ; 23(1): 216, 2023 Jun 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37337205

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the evidence-based guidelines promoted by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), the overuse of prescription drugs to manage COPD, particularly inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), remains a persistent challenge. In this real-world study, we evaluated how patients with COPD were divided into ABCD groups based on the 2017 GOLD guidelines, determined the rate of adherence to the GOLD treatment recommendations, described the rate of ICS usage, and determined the rate of triple therapy (TT) prescription. METHODS: The charts of 2291 patients diagnosed with COPD were retrospectively analyzed, of which 1438 matched the eligibility criteria. RESULTS: The average patient age was 69.6 ± 10.9 years; 52% of patients were female. The average COPD assessment test (CAT) score was 18.3 ± 9.1. The ABCD breakdown was as follows: group A 19.5%, group B 64.1%, group C 1.8%, and group D 14.6%. All groups, except group D, showed discordance in COPD treatment relative to the proposed GOLD guidelines. Only 18.9% of group A and 26% of group B were treated in concordance with the guidelines. TT was primarily used in group D (63.3%) and overused in groups A (30.6%) and B (47.8%). ICS was overused in all groups, particularly in groups A (56.2%) and B (67.3%). CONCLUSION: Studies from the last decade have consistently revealed a lack of conformity between what physicians prescribe and what GOLD guidelines recommend. The excessive usage of ICS, which continues despite all the associated adverse effects and the attributable costs, is concerning. The awareness of GOLD guidelines among primary care physicians (PCPs) and respiratory specialists needs to be improved.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides , Adhesión a Directriz , Prescripción Inadecuada , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(6): e2318061, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37310739

RESUMEN

Importance: Despite the increasing involvement of advanced practice practitioners (APPs; ie, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) in care delivery across specialties, the work patterns of APPs compared with physicians and how they are integrated into care teams have not been well characterized. Objective: To characterize differences between physicians and APPs across specialty types related to days with appointments, visit types seen, and time spent using the electronic health record (EHR). Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, cross-sectional study used EHR data from physicians and APPs (ie, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) at all US institutions that used Epic Systems' EHR between January and May 2021. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to April 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Appointment scheduling patterns, percentage of new and established and level of evaluation and management (E/M) visits, and EHR use metrics per day and week. Results: The sample consisted of 217 924 clinicians across 389 organizations, including 174 939 physicians and 42 985 APPs. Although primary care physicians were more likely than APPs to have more than 3 days per week with appointments (50 921 physicians [79.5%] vs 17 095 APPs [77.9%]), this trend was reversed for medical (38 645 physicians [64.8%] vs 8124 APPs [74.0%]) and surgical (24 155 physicians [47.1%] vs 5198 APPs [51.7%]) specialties. Medical and surgical specialty physicians saw 6.7 and 7.4 percentage points, respectively, more new patient visits than did their APP counterparts, whereas primary care physicians saw 2.8 percentage points fewer new patient visits than did APPs. Physicians saw a greater percentage of level 4 or 5 visits across all specialties. Medical and surgical physicians spent 34.3 and 45.8 fewer minutes per day, respectively, using the EHR than did APPs in their specialties, whereas primary care physicians spent 17.7 minutes per day more. These differences translated to primary care physicians spending 96.3 minutes more per week using the EHR than APPs, whereas medical and surgical physicians spent 149.9 and 140.7 fewer minutes, respectively, than did their APP counterparts. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional, national study of clinicians found significant differences in visit and EHR patterns for physicians compared with APPs across specialty types. By underscoring the different current usage of physicians vs APPs across specialty types, this study helps place into context the work and visit patterns of physicians compared with APPs and serves as a foundation for evaluations of clinical outcomes and quality.


Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Atención Primaria de Salud , Especialización , Humanos , Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada , Citas y Horarios , Estudios Transversales , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Enfermeras Practicantes , Asistentes Médicos , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37069844

RESUMEN

Background: The clinical guideline recommends use of long-acting ß2 agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA/LAMA) or long-acting ß2 agonists/inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) combination therapies for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The fixed-dose combination (FDC) inhalers of LABA/LAMA and LABA/ICS were reimbursed in Taiwan in 2015 and in 2002, respectively. This study aimed to examine prescription patterns of new use of either FDC therapy in real-world practice. Methods: We identified COPD patients who initiated LABA/LAMA FDC or LABA/ICS FDC between 2015 and 2018 from a population-based Taiwanese database with 2 million, randomly sampled beneficiaries enrolled in a single-payer health insurance system. We compared number of LABA/LAMA FDC and LABA/ICS FDC initiators in each calendar year, from different hospital accreditation levels, and cared for by different physician specialties. We also compared baseline patient characteristics between LABA/LAMA FDC and LABA/ICS FDC initiators. Results: A total of 12,455 COPD patients who initiated LABA/LAMA FDC (n=4019) or LABA/ICS FDC (n=8436) were included. Number of LABA/LAMA FDC initiators increased apparently (n=336 in 2015 versus n=1436 in 2018), but number of LABA/ICS FDC initiators decreased obviously (n=2416 in 2015 versus n=1793 in 2018) over time. The preference of use of LABA/LAMA FDC varied across clinical environments. The proportions of LABA/LAMA FDC initiators were more than 30% in the setting of non-primary care clinics (eg, medical centers) and in the services of chest physicians; but were only less than 10% in primary care clinics and non-chest physicians' services (eg, family medicine physicians). LABA/LAMA FDC initiators appeared to be older, male, to have more comorbidities, and to utilize resources more frequently compared to LABA/ICS FDC initiators. Conclusion: This real-world study found evident temporal trends, variations in healthcare provider, and differences in patient characteristics among COPD patients who initiated LABA/LAMA FDC or LABA/ICS FDC.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2 , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación de Medicamentos
19.
Sleep Health ; 9(2): 128-135, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36858835

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between race and time to pharmacologic treatment of insomnia in a large multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from a regional health information exchange. Eligible patients included adults with at least one healthcare visit per year from 2010 to 2019, a new insomnia diagnosis code during the study period, and no prior insomnia diagnosis codes or medications. A Cox frailty model was used to examine the association between race and time to an insomnia medication after diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 9557 patients were analyzed, 7773 (81.3%) of whom where White, 1294 (13.5%) Black, 238 (2.5%) Other, and 252 (2.6%) unknown race. About 6.2% of Black and 8% of Other race patients received an order for a Food and Drug Administration-approved insomnia medication after diagnosis compared with 13.5% of White patients. Black patients were significantly less likely to have an order for a Food and Drug Administration-approved insomnia medication at all time points (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] range: 0.37-0.73), and patients reporting Other race were less likely to have received an order at 2 (aHR 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.94), 3 (aHR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.79), and 4 years (aHR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.71) of follow-up. Similar results were observed in a sensitivity analysis including off-label medications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients belonging to racial minority groups are less likely to be prescribed an insomnia medication than White patients after accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Further research is needed to determine the extent to which patient preferences and physician perceptions affect these prescribing patterns and investigate potential disparities in nonpharmacologic treatment.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Grupos Raciales , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Adulto , Humanos , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Ann Surg ; 278(2): 216-221, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728693

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the association of evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines with new persistent opioid use after surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Patients exposed to opioids after surgery are at risk of new persistent opioid use, which is associated with opioid use disorder and overdose. It is unknown whether evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines mitigate this risk. METHODS: Using Medicare claims, we performed a difference-in-differences study of opioid-naive patients who underwent 1 of 6 common surgical procedures for which evidence-based postoperative opioid prescribing guidelines were released and disseminated through a statewide quality collaborative in Michigan in October 2017. The primary outcome was the incidence of new persistent opioid use, and the secondary outcome was total postoperative opioid prescription quantity in oral morphine equivalents (OME). RESULTS: We identified 24,908 patients who underwent surgery in Michigan and 118,665 patients who underwent surgery outside of Michigan. Following the release of prescribing guidelines in Michigan, the adjusted incidence of new persistent opioid use decreased from 3.29% (95% CI 3.15-3.43%) to 2.51% (95% CI 2.35-2.67%) in Michigan, which was an additional 0.53 (95% CI 0.36-0.69) percentage point decrease compared with patients outside of Michigan. Simultaneously, adjusted opioid prescription quantity decreased from 199.5 (95% CI 198.3-200.6) mg OME to 88.6 (95% CI 78.7-98.5) mg OME in Michigan, which was an additional 55.7 (95% CI 46.5-65.4) mg OME decrease compared with patients outside of Michigan. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of new persistent opioid use and the quantity of opioids prescribed after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Medicare , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Michigan/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...